Jeanne Faulconer on September 11th, 2009

Advocating for home education is aplenty for me. A decade ago, I decided to make home education my focus rather than “school reform.” However, I still pay attention to efforts to reform public education. One of the latest is the high profile campaign, Get Schooled.

The Get Schooled website is snappy and well-edited. There’s no chance of getting lost in a sea of position papers. The highly produced video on the site (“Watch the Show!”) features basketball star LeBron James, American Idol Kelly Clarkson, and United States President Barack Obama. The angle seems to be drop-out prevention and prep for college and a competitive labor market. It all seems very noble, but my decade of home educating has apparently made me cynical. The website emphasizes getting drop-outs to finish school and getting students to value education but seems to offer little opening for examining why school is so irrelevant for so many.

From the Get Schooled Press Room:

Every school day seven thousand students walk out on their education. One-third of all students fail to graduate high school. (Read More)

Call me a crazy homeschool mom, but when faced with having created educational opportunities that didn’t work for my kids and that they weren’t willing to participate in, I did major examination and restructuring of what I was offering them. I adjusted and still adjust (two of my kids are in college; one is still in the thick of home education). I don’t presume that my agenda is more important than theirs, and I allow them to learn at their own pace and through the lens of their interests. I encourage them to do a lot of physical work and hands-on projects. We split wood; we make art; we study crayfish; we debate today’s news; we cook; we dance; we write; we read. We discuss emerging goals and how to prepare for them. I’m honest about the work they need to do to reach their goals, and I provide resources, encouragement, and opportunities for changing directions.

I understand that this kind of customization either seems or truly is impossible in the current approach to public education, but I can’t quite see how a system that has seven thousand more students walk out each day can address its dropout problem from the “encourage kids to stay in school” and “parents should be cheerleaders” angles. If one third of the customers you serve walk out on you in the middle of your serving them, shouldn’t something far more radical be under consideration? Like major examination and restructuring of what school offers students? Including examining the presumption that school’s agenda is more important than students’ agendas? Including allowing students to truly work at their own pace and through the lens of their interests? Including allowing students to do physical work and hands-on projects?

The thing is, it’s so radical that we’d have to admit that a lot of what schools are doing can’t work. We’d have to admit that the emperor has no clothes, despite our paying a tremendous amount for them with our tax dollars. We’d have to admit that public education, rather than treating homeschoolers warily, should be looking to home education for insight and ideas for meeting kids’ needs.

And one more thing. “Get Schooled” as a pro-education theme sounds off-key to my ear. I mean, I get the pop culture atmospherics and edgy feel, but “Get Schooled” is far too accurate in encouraging kids to passively submit to a system that is failing so many. We could signal a real intent to serve students, including the 1/3 of students who don’t graduate, if we were creating a system that deserved a theme like “Figure out Where You Want to Go and Learn What You Need to Get There. We’ll Help.”

Alas, this would make kids more important than the status quo.

I didn’t find the political will existed to make kids more important than the status quo back when my sons began their educational journies, which explains why I first began homeschooling. I continue to doubt that the political will exists to make kids more important than the status quo, which explains why other parents will continue to begin homeschooling.

We’re not looking for our kids to “get schooled;” we’re looking for them to become educated.

Tags: customized education, dropouts, Get Schooled, homeschooling, public education, school reform

Jeanne Faulconer on September 7th, 2009

In honor of Labor Day, I thought I’d write a homeschooling-related Labor Day post. It’s always nice if you can come up with a clear thesis, one really good link that supports it, and a way to tie it all to home education. For several days I worked toward this, but the result persisted: no clear thesis would evolve. Instead, I spun around and around in the years of  talk our homeschooling family has experienced about labor laws, management, and work.

My family talks about “Labor” a lot. My husband is a factory manager in a non-union manufacturing facility, though he’s also worked in union environments. He’s definitely “management,” not ”Labor,” even though he’s found himself able to work well in both unionized and non-unionized environments. He’s worked as “Labor” himself, as a production operator during his school years.  And our history includes having lived and worked in textile mill towns; we’ve shown our kids the old pictures of nine-year olds standing on boxes to run dangerous textile equipment for a fraction of the pay an adult would receive.

One of our home educated sons has worked full-time at the dreaded Wal-Mart. Only he didn’t dread it. He excelled, and he came to a personal conclusion that the jobs Wal-Mart provided to some of his co-workers were the only jobs to be had in our economically depressed region – and that was before the Great Recession. He understood that in his case, the oft-reported low wages of Wal-Mart were subsidized by his ability to live in  his parents’ middle class home, yet his Wal-Mart experience stoked him with ambition and possibility. He moved rapidly from unloading trucks to a high-responsibility, high-integrity position, though he was never a manager during his just-less-than-a-year there. He talked daily with us about how some of his co-workers were benefiting from their Wal-Mart work, saving money for college or future entrepreneurial plans. He noted that some people who had apparently missed the lessons at home and school were  learning entry level job expectations (be on time, follow instructions) as well as learning about customer service and computers. He saw people who were  building or rebuilding lives on Wal-Mart wages – hurricane victims, former inmates, newly-divorced, recently laid off, back from the military, rejoining the work force after time at home with children, taking college classes, supporting a family.

Meanwhile, he did a lot of research and brought to our kitchen table discussion of  the criticisms that have been levelled at Wal-Mart. We’ve heard them all. He tried to work out the complexity of Wal-Mart’s impact on U.S. manufacturers and mom & pop hardware stores. We discussed his research and our perceptions of Wal-Mart’s impact on the environment, health insurance, consumerism, discrimination, competition, globalization, and local economic development.

Other kitchen table Labor discussions have seen us recalling the good old health care days for our family, when my husband worked in the automotive industry, and we luxuriated in a generous health care plan, available to us because of the plant’s need to stay competitive benefits-wise with union plants. On the other hand, we’ve also discussed the fact that the plant that once “ran wide open three shifts per day, seven days per week,” was closed — not competitive on the global market.

Our middle son’s work in a grocery store brought up other labor issues. Why were all the baggers male? Why were the males asked to mop up the messes (“Clean-up on Aisle Three”) and clear the parking lot of carts? Why were all the cashiers and assistant managers female but the managers male? Are gender roles at work more prevalent here in the South? More prevalent in grocery stores than in other businesses?

The youngest son is 11 and wants to work. He wants to know why he can’t legally do some jobs; we’re well aware of the laws to protect children, and yet he  willingly and ably splits wood for us even if he does fuss about emptying the dishwasher. We try to explain the morass of labor laws (no, you can’t pump gas or deliver papers or work in fast food right now); we explain about work permits. He frets and shifts his thinking to something entrepreneurial.

We discuss the relationship of work, labor laws and compulsory attendance. Our kids venture that one of the reasons kids are kept in school is to delay their cheap entry into the full-time labor market; they think that this creates an unhealthy situation for many in school.

“Guys need to work, Mom. A lot and hard. And they need money,” one of my sons asserts. We agree. Oh boy, do we agree.

At the kitchen table on college break, middle son reports on his classes, among them, macro-economics. I wonder aloud if it’s hard for him, since he never officially studied economics as a homeschooler. Financial management yes; macro-economics, not that we’d realized.

“Well, it’s generally pretty familiar actually, Mom.”

Oldest son, the one with Wal-Mart experience, turns aspects of his kitchen table discussions into a semester of college study, exploring competing theories on the globalization of business. We hear from him about the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, and trade groups.

And as our homeschooling family of five embarks on a Labor Day weekend canoeing on Virginia’s James River, we discuss the economic viability of the river company that has provided us with our equipment, and we find out that one of the guys who works there works as an Alaska king crab fisherman during Virginia’s off-season.

“You make a lot of money doing that, right?”

“I make a lot of money if I don’t get killed doing it,” he says of one of the world’s most dangerous jobs.

And thus, our family, launched into the river, is launched into another discussion of Labor.

Tags: college, economics, Higher Education, homeschool to college, homeschooling, Labor, Labor Day, macro-economics, Unschooling


Jeanne Faulconer on September 1st, 2009

I’ve heard a few non-homeschoolers doubt that homeschoolers can get prepared for college. They wonder if their parents have the chops and connections to assist their high school age children. Besides knowing a ton of homeschooled-to-college kids who disprove their presumption, I’ve also been fortunate to see the valuable opportunities homeschoolers provide for one another. One such opportunity is coming up– the VaHomeschoolers Seminar on Homeschooling  and College Entrance, to be held Wednesday,  November 11, 2009 at the Science Museum of Virginia in Richmond.

In addition to editing for Home Education Magazine, I edit VaHomeschoolers Voice, so I’m fortunate to know and work with the wonderful volunteer who’s organizing this seminar. Leslie Nathaniel, seminar coordinator, is making sure homeschoolers can get all the information needed to plan a successful high school  experience and negotiate the college admissions process.

Leslie has set up a variety of sessions, including:

    • Homeschooling the High School Years
    • Transcripts without Tears
    • College Admissions Q & A
    • Investigating Opportunities for Financial Aid
    • Community College Education for Homeschoolers.

The seminar will feature the wisdom of experienced homeschool parents as well as up-to-date admissions information and advice from college representatives. College reps will attend from University of Richmond, Virginia Commonwealth University,  Shenandoah University, Old Dominion University, Virginia Tech, and the Virginia Community College System.

The assistant director for financial aid for the State Council  of Higher Education for Virginia will also be on hand to provide information about financial aid.

Two of my three sons are currently in college, having been homeschooled since second and fourth grades. I look forward to participating in the seminar, and I’m sure hoping to pick up some financial aid tips!

I’ve heard that space for the seminar is limited, so if you want to go, I urge you to register now.

Tags: college, college admissions, College Entrance Seminar, Financial Aid, high school, High School Transcripts, Higher Education, homeschool to college, Leslie Nathaniel, Old Dominion University, Organization of Virginia Homeschoolers, Science Museum of Virginia, Shenandoah University, University of Richmond, VaHomeschoolers, Virginia Commonwealth University, Virginia Community College, Virginia Tech

Jeanne Faulconer on August 27th, 2009

Preparing homeschooled kids who plan to attend college can be challenging, and some of us have occasional doubts about whether we’re doing well enough. I was happy to receive this text message from our middle son last night: “I just got out of my western culture class. I’m glad you had me do The Odyssey because we’re starting with reading the book.”

A fist pumping “Yes!” on my part was followed by some reminiscing. I first introduced the boys to The Odyssey with an audio recording by story teller Odds Bodkin. It’s an epic telling of the story, which Bodkin’s website describes this way:

Crouched in the dark belly of the Trojan Horse, you wait. Nervous warriors breathe quietly, swords wrapped for silence. Suddenly someone’s mind is speaking. . . .  Prepare to meet Odysseus of Ithaca, grasped by fate and hurled to the ends of the earth.

Nice to know that as my son continues his educational odyssey, something we started learning about a decade ago is valuable and familiar.

Tags: audio books. story tellers, Higher Education, homeschool to college, Odds Bodkin, The Odyssey

Jeanne Faulconer on August 24th, 2009

Editors, of course, pay a lot of attention to words, though some eurekas take longer to develop than they should. Reading to my youngest from The Story of Science again tonight, I realized that “matter” – the basic structural component of the universe – has its roots in the Latin word “materia,” which is derived from the Latin word “mater.” You got it: mater is Latin for mother. Of course!  Mother – the basic structural component of the universe!

I know, this is an embarrassingly late connection for an English major. Maybe it took me all these years of motherhood to really grasp the significance of such an elegant etymology.

Or maybe it just took Joy Hakim’s wisdom. She points out the shoulda-been-obvious-to-me in Aristotle Leads the Way:

The Original Indo-European word for both “mother” and “matter” was mater. . . .  Both mother and matter, in ancient minds, were the origin of all things. I think the ancients had it right. (page 40)

No wonder Hakim’s books are so popular with homeschool maters – uh – homeschool mothers.

Tags: etymology, Joy Hakim, matter, mother, science books, Story of Science