UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
CHERYL LINDSEY SEELHOFF,
a married woman,
Plaintiff, Tacoma, Washington
vs.
PAT and SUE WELCH,
husband and wife,
Defendants.
Docket No. C97-5383FDB
Tacoma, Washington
September 1, 1998
Trial
Volume 2
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE HONORABLE FRANKLIN D. BURGESS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE, and a Jury.
APPEARANCES:
For the Plaintiff:
BARBARA J. DUFFY
GWENDOLYN PAYTON KLEIN
Lane Powell Spears Lubersky
1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4100
Seattle, Washington 98101-2338
For the Defendants:
RUDY R. LACHENMEIER
LORI DeDOBBELAERE
Lachenmeier, Enloe & Rall
9600 S.W. Capitol Highway
Portland, Oregon 97219
Court Reporter: Teri Hendrix
Union Station Courthouse, Room 3100
1717 Pacific Avenue
Tacoma, Washington 98402
(253) 593-6545
Proceedings recorded by mechanical stenography, transcript
produced by Reporter on computer.
Excerpt from transcripts Volume 2 September 1, 1998 Pages 210-445
How to use these documents.
A complete copy of the transcript are availble on an independent web site.
http://members.aol.com/Hsingcase/index.html
(Link provide by permission)
Documents can be ordered by writing to:
US District Court
Western District of Washington
P.O. Box 1935
Tacoma, Washington 98401
391
1 Did you also, as a fruit of her repentance, ask her to stop
2 from public speaking?
3 A. For a time.
4 Q. So your answer is yes?
5 A. For a short period of time, yes.
6 Q. And one of the proofs of repentance was that Cheryl Lindsey
7 should not answer her telephone; isn't that correct?
8 A. I don't remember saying that.
9 This is 194 we are talking about?
10 Q. Correct. One of the fruits of repentance put upon Cheryl
11 Lindsey was that she was not to answer her telephone; is that
12 right?
13 A. I could have said that.
14 Q. Do you remember testifying in your deposition that you did
15 indeed say that?
16 A. I may have.
17 Q. Now, after Cheryl returned from the CHEO convention you
18 confronted her with the fact that you knew Rick Seelhoff had
19 seen her at the CHEO convention in Ohio; isn't that right?
20 A. Somewhat.
21 Q. Do you remember talking to Cheryl Lindsey about the fact
22 that you knew that she had seen Rick Seelhoff at the CHEO
23 convention in Ohio?
24 A. I remember.
25 Q. And you told her that you had learned this information from
392
1 Gregg Harris; isn't that right?
2 A. That's right.
3 Q. And that was the time in which you told Cheryl that she
4 needed to stop from public speaking for some amount of time;
5 isn't that right?
6 A. I don't remember if that was the time or not, I can't
7 recall.
8 Q. But you do remember telling her that at some point?
9 A. At some point I did tell her she should step down from
10 public speaking, yes, I did say that.
11 Q. That was the same point at which you told her she should
12 stop publishing Gentle Spirit; correct?
13 A. I thought she should stop publishing Gentle Spirit for a
14 time.
15 Q. That was communicated to Cheryl Lindsey?
16 A. I get the times mixed up.
17 I am trying to get my -- Barbara can tell you about me.
18 Q. My point is less to get a precise date from you than to just
19 get your understanding that that was something that was said to
20 Cheryl Lindsey during this particular time period; correct?
21 A. Correct.
22 Q. Your answer is yes?
23 A.Yes.
24 Q. I want to show you a letter that's already previously been
25 introduced into evidence in this case.